Engineering pictures
Nov. 26th, 2009 01:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Still in the process of figuring out how to make my 1872 bustle instructions work. There are of course mistakes and gaps the size of Texas in it, but I think I have it. Mostly.
Exhibit one : sewing the boning channels and preparing the gathers.

Exhibit two : a purple mess.

Exhibit three : Heimlich gives his enlightened opinion on a trial version with only 5 bones.

Exhibit four : it looks a little better if it sits lower, right ?

The instructions tell me to attach it to a petticoat. I think I'll but front and side panels, and will do a split back panel that ties or laces closed, because there's no way the bustle will hold its shape without something tying it together behind my legs (it has just two ties in the pictures). And I obviously need to add a shaped yoke above the bustle as well, but I saw that coming.
Little Heimlich seems VERY interested by the bustle, I must say. Much more than by say, the cat, or even myself sometimes.
Exhibit one : sewing the boning channels and preparing the gathers.

Exhibit two : a purple mess.

Exhibit three : Heimlich gives his enlightened opinion on a trial version with only 5 bones.

Exhibit four : it looks a little better if it sits lower, right ?

The instructions tell me to attach it to a petticoat. I think I'll but front and side panels, and will do a split back panel that ties or laces closed, because there's no way the bustle will hold its shape without something tying it together behind my legs (it has just two ties in the pictures). And I obviously need to add a shaped yoke above the bustle as well, but I saw that coming.
Little Heimlich seems VERY interested by the bustle, I must say. Much more than by say, the cat, or even myself sometimes.
no subject
on 2009-11-26 12:35 pm (UTC)Now I want to sew. It's been nearly three months I didn't have the want. Proof your bustle look good enough !!
Heimlich = natural born costumer !!
no subject
on 2009-11-26 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 06:47 pm (UTC)Je vais tout relire en essayant d'allumer la lumière !! Non, parce qu'un cerveau plongé dans le noir, forcément, c'est pas brillant. (remarque le jeu de mot vaseux)
no subject
on 2009-11-26 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-27 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-27 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-26 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-11-30 02:47 pm (UTC)