green_martha: (nana)
green_martha ([personal profile] green_martha) wrote2008-11-11 10:48 am
Entry tags:

Simplicity short stays pictures

I know, I promised them some days ago, but the week has somehow flown by, and I don't know wher emy free time went. Then we were visiting [livejournal.com profile] argyronete over the week-end (it IS a six hours drive forth, and the same back, Sister, I told you so !), which was good but exhausting. Luckily, I have today and tomorrow off, so I can catch up a bit.

Plase excuse the nylon slip under it, I have yet to make a regency shift, and my rococo one I forgot at [livejournal.com profile] lady_darkstone's place. I shall get it back tomorrow in time for The Duchess.

This was the state of the underwear a week ago. When I tried it on, the short stays were acually a little tighter than I wanted at the bottom (and maybe a smidge too wide at the top), but I hope to break them in by the wedding. And if not, I can still not lace them closed - and still get the right shape in the boobs area. And besides, I'll bring along a modern change of underwear just in case my sternum decides to hurt.
You were right, [livejournal.com profile] fiofiorina, the straps angle is wrong, too, but it didn't show on the mock up and I'm NOT altering that after I put the binding on.

Right now, I've cut out, sewn together, flatfelled* and attached the skirt portion to the stays. Much swearing ensued as I can NOT iron my linen into submission. I managed to make it look okay, but not really wrinkle-free. Maybe letting it hang for a while and adding the bottom ruffles will do the trick. If not, well... wrinkly it will be.


* By hand. It would have been very unlike me some years ago, but after seeig how fast it goes and how much neater it looks on the outside, I was sold on that. Actually, I even attached the skirt to the stays by hand over the week-end.