Regency boobs support woes
Oct. 5th, 2008 07:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm fighting with the Simplicity/Sense&Sensibility short stays pattern. And I can tell you that my boobs are NOT in the place where an average woman's boobs are. Methinks I have some patterning to make tonight.
Onto mock-up #2... Never surrender, never give up... *goes forth clapping hands in a stupid way*
Onto mock-up #2... Never surrender, never give up... *goes forth clapping hands in a stupid way*
no subject
on 2008-10-05 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-05 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-05 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-05 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-05 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-08 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-05 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-08 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-06 12:20 am (UTC)That said--and operating under that idea--I made the short stays recently, scaled up to fit my 43 DD-DDD chest. Since I have the luxury of a sewing group to discuss fit with, I brought my first, pretty much straight from the pattern, mock-up to Sewing, and had the group debate the fit. They recommended adding 2 inches to the center front opening, and 1 inch between the gussets, because the chest was not wide enough (originally both gussets fell to the outside of the nipple/bust point, and they're supposed to straddle it), and also adding about an inch and a half to the height, because of the muffins-on-a-platter effect. (I find most patterns for large-cup women add horizontal inches, but forget that they are covering a 3-D globe, and that the vertical dimension also needs inches: cantalopes are not just wider than grapefruits or tomatoes, they are "deeper", too).
I made up my second mock-up--and had to reduce the inches at the center front because the lacing holes overlapped this time, instead of butting, or leaving any gap. Oops! I also put in a drawstring false chemise front about 2 inches taller the top edge of the stays, to keep down the "waterfall effect" that sometimes happens (that vertical dimension again), and because I was in a hurry, put on a petticoat skirt so I didn't need a chemise at all.
The resulting stays work pretty well, but if I make them again, and I think I will make the bust gusset longer, and taper it in again a little at the top, to add to the containment properties. Not all of us are Regency sylphs.
no subject
on 2008-10-08 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2008-10-06 05:57 am (UTC)Then next try out - Nehelenia Patterns. Works for anything bigger then 85 - under: No Way. And mind the straps. Both, NP & S&S need to be adjusted.
I ended by recommending NP to the EP-Girls, and my stays are the basic Diderot-Pattern for 18th century stays, shortened, and then marked where I wanted gussets. Therefore - don't surrender if it doesn't work :-)
no subject
on 2008-10-08 06:17 pm (UTC)